<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for A Blog of Thinking Allowed</title>
	<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net</link>
	<description>A place for the contemplative thoughts of a philosopher.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 22:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on And he&#8217;s not a bigot??? by drjean</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2009/07/25/and-hes-not-a-bigot/#comment-5617</link>
		<dc:creator>drjean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2009/07/25/and-hes-not-a-bigot/#comment-5617</guid>
		<description>Well, we, the American People, gave him the benefit of the doubt.  And there were many doubts.  Now we have given him even more benefits of the doubt.  If anyone has studied history, they can see his tactics, and the people's naivity in disbelief and lack of response, never end up profiting a good society.

When are WE the American People, going to stand up and DO something?  This man and his team are NOT democrats nor republicans and not even "normal" liberals to the USA.  They are acting like socialists and communists (indeed, he even has at least one proclaimed communist on his staff.)  Now if they act like a duck, and quack like a duck, when are we going to treat them like ducks???  
  
Fortunately, his support base IS catching on to his un-American policies, and his approval rating is below %50 now.  I hope we nip this soon, rather than wait the 3 1/2 years remaining in his term.  

Just my POV of course. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we, the American People, gave him the benefit of the doubt.  And there were many doubts.  Now we have given him even more benefits of the doubt.  If anyone has studied history, they can see his tactics, and the people&#8217;s naivity in disbelief and lack of response, never end up profiting a good society.</p>
<p>When are WE the American People, going to stand up and DO something?  This man and his team are NOT democrats nor republicans and not even &#8220;normal&#8221; liberals to the USA.  They are acting like socialists and communists (indeed, he even has at least one proclaimed communist on his staff.)  Now if they act like a duck, and quack like a duck, when are we going to treat them like ducks???  </p>
<p>Fortunately, his support base IS catching on to his un-American policies, and his approval rating is below %50 now.  I hope we nip this soon, rather than wait the 3 1/2 years remaining in his term.  </p>
<p>Just my POV of course. <img src='http://drjean.psychcentral.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on And he&#8217;s not a bigot??? by kjett</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2009/07/25/and-hes-not-a-bigot/#comment-5613</link>
		<dc:creator>kjett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2009/07/25/and-hes-not-a-bigot/#comment-5613</guid>
		<description>You know, I had a feeling something was up when he aligned himself with that over-the-top reverend in the beginning.  How can you go to a church like that for so long and not believe or practice what is preached?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I had a feeling something was up when he aligned himself with that over-the-top reverend in the beginning.  How can you go to a church like that for so long and not believe or practice what is preached?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public schools with Religious intent! by drjean</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/19/public-schools-with-religious-intent/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>drjean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/19/public-schools-with-religious-intent/#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>mirla,  one does not need to teach religion in school to allow faith to be there.  Indeed,  evidences of faith and activities of same occur in our Capitol building almost daily.  In fact, it was home to many Sunday services during the times of the foundation of our country.

You know, that's what makes this country different than all the rest.  That's what makes this country better than most, in many respects.  Our faith in God and our dedication to Him.  This country began it's existence to do just that.  One can live in any other country of their choosing, if they don't like it.

I suppose, since you are against religion being taught in schools, and only wish to have scientific principles there, that you have contacted your congressman to protest the forced "becoming a muslim" weeks and also the teaching of evolution then?  I surely hope so.  I do hope you are true to your own beliefs.

(For intellectual discussions about science and God, click on the link Reasons.org.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mirla,  one does not need to teach religion in school to allow faith to be there.  Indeed,  evidences of faith and activities of same occur in our Capitol building almost daily.  In fact, it was home to many Sunday services during the times of the foundation of our country.</p>
<p>You know, that&#8217;s what makes this country different than all the rest.  That&#8217;s what makes this country better than most, in many respects.  Our faith in God and our dedication to Him.  This country began it&#8217;s existence to do just that.  One can live in any other country of their choosing, if they don&#8217;t like it.</p>
<p>I suppose, since you are against religion being taught in schools, and only wish to have scientific principles there, that you have contacted your congressman to protest the forced &#8220;becoming a muslim&#8221; weeks and also the teaching of evolution then?  I surely hope so.  I do hope you are true to your own beliefs.</p>
<p>(For intellectual discussions about science and God, click on the link Reasons.org.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Public schools with Religious intent! by mirla</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/19/public-schools-with-religious-intent/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>mirla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 03:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/19/public-schools-with-religious-intent/#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Just because religion founded schools doesn't mean that they still has to be taught in school. While it was one of the driving forces behind education, it also for many centuries before during the Middle Ages it was also the reason why even basic education was reserved for royalty because the catholic church had become corrupt with power.  I firmly believe that those slogans were changed and that religion was no longer taught in public schools because as time progresses, many things in society change, for better or for worse. The people decided that because religion can niether be fully provenor disproven that it should not belong in an institution based on teaching children facts that have been proven and can be proven again if needed. Of course the higher you go in education the more abstract the information becomes and many alternatives may be explored simply because we don't know and may never know everything.

My main problem is that when people try to advocate teaching religion is schools, it is mostly associated as an alternative to science. I personaly find that in modern society the scientific knowlege is much more valuable in order to survive in a very intellectualy competative international setting, no matter how spiritualy and emotionaly fullfulling religion may be. When it goes right down to religion versus science then it really comes down to either the vast knowlege of what someone thinks how something can be explained, versus the limited knowlege of what someone knows can be explained. Alot of things in religion cannot be proven and many ideas and consepts can be abstract with multiple interpretations, and with the exception of scientific theories, all of science can be proven because the only way something can become a law in scince is that it can be proven without a shadow of a doubt. 

If you want your children to learn religion there are also alternatives to public school that can get equaly as well of an education (if not better) such as private and catholic schools.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because religion founded schools doesn&#8217;t mean that they still has to be taught in school. While it was one of the driving forces behind education, it also for many centuries before during the Middle Ages it was also the reason why even basic education was reserved for royalty because the catholic church had become corrupt with power.  I firmly believe that those slogans were changed and that religion was no longer taught in public schools because as time progresses, many things in society change, for better or for worse. The people decided that because religion can niether be fully provenor disproven that it should not belong in an institution based on teaching children facts that have been proven and can be proven again if needed. Of course the higher you go in education the more abstract the information becomes and many alternatives may be explored simply because we don&#8217;t know and may never know everything.</p>
<p>My main problem is that when people try to advocate teaching religion is schools, it is mostly associated as an alternative to science. I personaly find that in modern society the scientific knowlege is much more valuable in order to survive in a very intellectualy competative international setting, no matter how spiritualy and emotionaly fullfulling religion may be. When it goes right down to religion versus science then it really comes down to either the vast knowlege of what someone thinks how something can be explained, versus the limited knowlege of what someone knows can be explained. Alot of things in religion cannot be proven and many ideas and consepts can be abstract with multiple interpretations, and with the exception of scientific theories, all of science can be proven because the only way something can become a law in scince is that it can be proven without a shadow of a doubt. </p>
<p>If you want your children to learn religion there are also alternatives to public school that can get equaly as well of an education (if not better) such as private and catholic schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You think you know what &#8220;tolerance&#8221; is?  Bet you&#8217;re wrong! by drjean</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/12/you-think-you-know-what-tolerance-is-bet-youre-wrong/#comment-1278</link>
		<dc:creator>drjean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 18:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/12/you-think-you-know-what-tolerance-is-bet-youre-wrong/#comment-1278</guid>
		<description>Mirla,  telling others about the love of God is not a hate crime.  The problem with the hate crime bills are they are overreaching.  People can share their sexual preferences in all those places you mention, why not faith?  

Your comments are exactly the proof that people have tolerance for everything else, just not Christianity.  What the issue is IS that we are not allowed to share our faith even without hurting another, with regard to the "hate crimes" bill. How tolerant is that?

The time and place is here and now.  America was founded to escape just such intolerances perpetrated upon the people in Old England.  If we need another tea party, count me in!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mirla,  telling others about the love of God is not a hate crime.  The problem with the hate crime bills are they are overreaching.  People can share their sexual preferences in all those places you mention, why not faith?  </p>
<p>Your comments are exactly the proof that people have tolerance for everything else, just not Christianity.  What the issue is IS that we are not allowed to share our faith even without hurting another, with regard to the &#8220;hate crimes&#8221; bill. How tolerant is that?</p>
<p>The time and place is here and now.  America was founded to escape just such intolerances perpetrated upon the people in Old England.  If we need another tea party, count me in!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You think you know what &#8220;tolerance&#8221; is?  Bet you&#8217;re wrong! by A</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/12/you-think-you-know-what-tolerance-is-bet-youre-wrong/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 00:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/12/you-think-you-know-what-tolerance-is-bet-youre-wrong/#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>That's SO true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s SO true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on You think you know what &#8220;tolerance&#8221; is?  Bet you&#8217;re wrong! by mirla</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/12/you-think-you-know-what-tolerance-is-bet-youre-wrong/#comment-1244</link>
		<dc:creator>mirla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 20:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/10/12/you-think-you-know-what-tolerance-is-bet-youre-wrong/#comment-1244</guid>
		<description>Tolerance works both ways, I tolerate christianity as well as other religions so long as they do not try to "spread the word" directly in my face. Unless your religion is like Islam and requires you to pray five times a day regardless of were you are or something similiar that requires you to practice outside of your own home or church. I leave my religion at my door out of respect for others, and I expect others to do the same. 

"Hate Crime" is alot more serious then you seem to make it out to be. If someone say, discrimainates against a gay person because it goes against their Christian beliefs then I would consider that a hate crime, the same way as if someone were discriminating against someone for their race. If someone wrote the word nigger on a black person's belongings that is a hat crime, the same way as calling someone a faggot because they are both offensive and derogitory terms. If someone says something that hurts your feelings then they should be confronted, not necessarily charged with any sort of crime, but it isn't okay either. 

Regardless of what you think is the truth there are no garuntees in this marvelous little planet we call earth.

In the contexts of Christianity, I believe that god created people of many different variety, black, white, asian, gay, straight, who are we to doubt God's creation? To say something that he created in his own image to be an abomination?

"If we don’t fight these efforts to create “hate crimes” bills, then we will be corralled and not allowed to speak God’s truth, not allowed to share and help others lost in their sin, not allowed to show the love of God through Word"

There is a time and a place for everything. Some places are just not okay to share your beliefs with others. School is not a place, work is not a place, you will still have your freedom to share, but not in a way that is considered harmful to others. If someone cannot share their ideas without hurting someone then it is truely a sad world.

Okay, getting off of my soapbox now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tolerance works both ways, I tolerate christianity as well as other religions so long as they do not try to &#8220;spread the word&#8221; directly in my face. Unless your religion is like Islam and requires you to pray five times a day regardless of were you are or something similiar that requires you to practice outside of your own home or church. I leave my religion at my door out of respect for others, and I expect others to do the same. </p>
<p>&#8220;Hate Crime&#8221; is alot more serious then you seem to make it out to be. If someone say, discrimainates against a gay person because it goes against their Christian beliefs then I would consider that a hate crime, the same way as if someone were discriminating against someone for their race. If someone wrote the word nigger on a black person&#8217;s belongings that is a hat crime, the same way as calling someone a faggot because they are both offensive and derogitory terms. If someone says something that hurts your feelings then they should be confronted, not necessarily charged with any sort of crime, but it isn&#8217;t okay either. </p>
<p>Regardless of what you think is the truth there are no garuntees in this marvelous little planet we call earth.</p>
<p>In the contexts of Christianity, I believe that god created people of many different variety, black, white, asian, gay, straight, who are we to doubt God&#8217;s creation? To say something that he created in his own image to be an abomination?</p>
<p>&#8220;If we don’t fight these efforts to create “hate crimes” bills, then we will be corralled and not allowed to speak God’s truth, not allowed to share and help others lost in their sin, not allowed to show the love of God through Word&#8221;</p>
<p>There is a time and a place for everything. Some places are just not okay to share your beliefs with others. School is not a place, work is not a place, you will still have your freedom to share, but not in a way that is considered harmful to others. If someone cannot share their ideas without hurting someone then it is truely a sad world.</p>
<p>Okay, getting off of my soapbox now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Say NO to &#8220;O&#8221; by Liza's Eyeview</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/09/30/say-no-to-o-2/#comment-1175</link>
		<dc:creator>Liza's Eyeview</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 03:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/09/30/say-no-to-o-2/#comment-1175</guid>
		<description>Thank you for making a stand and sharing your point of view.
I don't watch Oprah and will not watch it. Actually, we do not even have a TV connected to network channel.  Anyway, may Christians who watch her show be as discerning as you are ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for making a stand and sharing your point of view.<br />
I don&#8217;t watch Oprah and will not watch it. Actually, we do not even have a TV connected to network channel.  Anyway, may Christians who watch her show be as discerning as you are &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A &#8220;small&#8221; miracle from God tonight by rapunzel</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/09/18/a-small-miracle-from-god-tonight/#comment-1140</link>
		<dc:creator>rapunzel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 04:13:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/09/18/a-small-miracle-from-god-tonight/#comment-1140</guid>
		<description>That really was nifty.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really was nifty.  <img src='http://drjean.psychcentral.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Real Fruit of the Spirit by mcw</title>
		<link>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/08/03/the-real-fruit-of-the-spirit/#comment-955</link>
		<dc:creator>mcw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 04:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://drjean.psychcentral.net/2008/08/03/the-real-fruit-of-the-spirit/#comment-955</guid>
		<description>has been that person in your post above more times than one cares to count.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has been that person in your post above more times than one cares to count.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
